Posts Tagged marketing
Happy New Year and Hello 2010!
Posted by Joie Tamkin in Client Appreciation on January 8th, 2010
We want to wish all of our friends and valued clients a Happy New Year. 2009 was a success and we are looking forward to another prosperous year for our clients.
Congratulations to Campus Advantage for ending 2009 very strong, despite the economic downturn. Campus Advantage continues to be the market leader in Student Housing Management, and was able to grow its portfolio over the past year at the same growth rate as previous years.
Mike Peter is the CEO of Campus Advantage and not only is he the driving force behind the company’s ambitions, he also has a personality that lights up every room. Haven’t met him yet? Feb. 22 – 23 is your chance! Come to the National Apartment Association Conference in Las Vegas. Meet Mike Peter and other top executives from the Student Housing Industry as they share tips and outlooks for a successful 2010.
c.a.k. + associates will be in Vegas on the trade show floor, so please come visit us as well. We have some very exciting plans for our firm and innovative plans for our clients and future clients. We would love to chat with you about growing your business.
If you can’t join us at the blackjack tables in Vegas than come by our offices in Westlake. We have fresh coffee and a killer portfolio.

The Most Engaged Brands on the Web
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 21st, 2009

Most Engaged Brands on the WEb
If your company doesn’t have a Social Media Plan, perhaps this post will help you take the digital step. We invite you to contact us today to get your Social Media Plan started.
Recently, analyst Charlene Li of the Altimeter Group and Wetpaint conducted a study and ranked the top 100 brands by their social media engagement. The report highlighted best practices in use by brands and identified four types of Social Media groups:
- Mavens – most engaged
- Butterflies – engaged, but spread too thin
- Selectives – somewhat engaged, limited scope
- Wallflowers – just dipping their toes in
The surprising conclusion of this study found that “socially engaged companies are in fact more financially successful.” More Tweets = more bucks.
Yes it pays to be social but by being social in the wrong or uninformed way could have reverse affects on your business’ growth. Setting up a Facebook page or Twitter account isn’t enough to see the dollars flow in. You need a consistent and focused approach to how you use social media as a way to inform your customers, and potential customers, about your business.
Here are some best practices used by Starbucks (has a social media team of only six people):
- Deputize people in your organization – ensure that everyone is “bought in” prior to launching your social media plan, there will be better follow through and better results.
- Understand how each social media channel provides a different dimension of engagement.
- Centralize coordination – protect your brand, ensure the right people are communicating in the right way.
- Find champions who can explain and mitigate risk – make sure you have someone who “gets” social media and can communicate it to your organization.
In starting your Social Media plan, emphasize the quality of your engagement, not just the quantity of outlets you participate in. Build your base deep, learn from your mistakes and make sure everything you do is done with a goal in mind.
The full report can be found below. If you are ready to create your Social Media plan, we’re here to help.
Make Your Employees the Voice of Your Brand Online
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 1st, 2009
We’ve all heard about the power of social media when it comes to getting a message out to your customers quickly and easily. It is a trend that is sure to evolve and become increasingly engrained in business owners’ standard operating procedures. Even today, large companies are beginning to establish Social Media Policies that identify what the goal is for a social media campaign and what vehicles will be used to attain that goal.
I recently read this article in Advertising Age, written by Emily Bryson York, that speaks to how one BBQ chain involved its employees in building a massive online following.
“CHICAGO (AdAge.com) — While many marketers are starting to understand that their employees can be their greatest asset, one small barbecue chain has taken it to an entirely new level. Smokey Bones, a 68-unit franchise concentrated in Florida and on the Eastern seaboard, has given some of its employees second jobs — as its social marketers.
The concept is the brainchild of Smokey’s agency of record, Push, Orlando, Fla. Push was tasked with rebranding the chain last year after it was divested by Darden Restaurants, which owns Red Lobster and Olive Garden. Smokey had previously sported a log-cabin, summer-camp look and catered to an older, barbecue-centric crowd. New owner Sun Capital, a buyout firm that also owns Boston Market, wanted to reinvigorate online communication and build a younger, hipper persona on a limited budget. The chain’s sharper new look, both online and in restaurants, emphasizes the bar and shows activities by location.
A ‘fantastic army’
“Essentially it kind of snowballed out of much bigger top-line idea of basically localizing a website,” said Mark Unger, new-media creative director for Push. For each location, the chain selected someone who worked there to be a “web host.” Each restaurant-employee-cum-spokesperson runs a web page for his or her particular location and communicates with that location’s “Smokey Bones family” members (what one might call fans or friends on a social-media site). Each web host or hostess has a mirror site on Facebook and MySpace. Some restaurants have between 5,000 and 10,000 followers.
“It almost created this really fantastic army that’s out there working hard on a local level,” Mr. Unger said. “It’s really changed the brand from being a very Darden establishment to be a very exciting place that’s really relevant right now.”
The specific restaurant pages, which consumers reach by entering a zip code at smokeybones.com, list events coming to the location, games that might be on at the bar, drink specials or photos from recent events.
Since the new website and associated features went live in February, web traffic is up 50% and the chain’s e-mail list has increased 30%, “to the six-figure range,” Mr. Unger said. Building the e-mail database was critical for the agency, which will rely heavily on e-mail blasts for future marketing efforts. Across the Facebook, MySpace and corporate pages, Mr. Unger said, the chain is adding about 2,200 followers each month. The web launch was accompanied by limited print and outdoor support.
“Let’s give them points — they’re doing something a whole lot of small restaurants aren’t doing,” said Chris Brogan, president of Boston-based New Marketing Labs. He added that while the initial e-mail list and fan base are encouraging signs, they don’t necessarily equate to new customers, or repeat customers. He suggested building on the initial success with measures that will foster “true engagement,” such as discounts associated with signing up online.
Perks of hosting
To get this far, Push and Smokey Bones identified staff members who were already web-savvy and put them through social-media training, complete with a handbook. The company owns its local social-network pages, which are distinct from the web hosts’ personal Facebook or MySpace pages.
While each Facebook page carries the host’s likeness, it may be called something like “Julie Web Hostess.” The pages are monitored at the agency, corporate and franchisee levels. Since the chain, like any other in the restaurant business, has relatively high turnover, web hosts who leave the company surrender access to their pages so another staff member can take over. But Smokey Bones probably won’t have trouble finding replacements, as it pays the web hosts over and above their regular salaries to run the pages.
Getting social: Four easy tips
So you want your employees to be your social-media advocates?
It’s surprising more companies don’t do this, noted Josh Bernoff, co-author of Groundswell and senior VP-idea development at Forrester Research, in an e-mail interview. “Employees speak for the company often at conferences, on sales calls and the like,” he said. “Companies need to extend their policies to social media, but the principles are the same.”
Whether you have a structured program like Smokey Bones or are just facing the reality that your employees are out there — and talking about you — here are a few pointers.
WRITE WHAT YOU KNOW. This is a tip cribbed from Intel’s employee social-media guidelines. The company encourages full-timers and contractors to have a social-media presence but urges them to “stick to your area of expertise and provide unique, individual perspectives on what’s going on at Intel and in the world.”
BE HUMAN. If a big reason for social communication is to “humanize” a brand, for goodness sakes don’t babble on in marketing speak and inside lingo. Encourage employees to speak in first person and be real.
KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRANSPARENCY AND ANGST. Everything an employee says could be heard by a customer, including the last one. So remember, being transparent and authentic doesn’t mean they have to say everything on their mind. It’s the difference between ‘It’s so hot outside,” or “Do you think we should paint?” and “I hated those guys who just ordered lemonade,” said Terry Dry, president of Fanscape, a Los Angeles-based digital word-of-mouth marketing agency.
BUILD AN ARMY. Make it part of people’s jobs, said Forrester’s Mr. Bernoff. “It’s great for somebody to have a job as a tweeter. [It's] much better if tweeting, Facebook, blogging, etc. is part of lots of employees’ jobs.”
Corporate Approach to Social Media a Major #Fail
Posted by c.a.k. + associates in Uncategorized on June 4th, 2009
Awesome article by Lindsey Allen:
Too often, archaic strategies undermine the efforts of those with hands-on networking experience
If you watch ABC’s “Desperate Housewives” or TBS’ “My Boys,” you know both shows have delved into the social media realm in recent weeks. The questionable results drove home a larger point about how companies and organizations are handling social media.
On one of the last “Desperate Housewives” episodes of the season, Tom Scavo returned home from a job interview, distraught that he’d “become irrelevant.” He lamented to wife Lynette that he’d been stumped by a question about “(using) ‘Twittering’ as part of a marketing campaign.”
Setting aside the notion that the writer may have had the character reference “Twittering” (rather than “Twitter” or “tweeting”) to illustrate his ignorance,
the ensuing dialogue was painful to digest. Clearly, the writer wasn’t someone who uses — or even truly understands — Twitter.
Just a couple of days later, an episode of “My Boys” focused on Facebook. Although the references were accurate, they were outdated — about 18 months too late, probably. I bet there is someone on the show’s staff who, if consulted, would have said, “Shouldn’t we be focusing this episode on Twitter instead? Or at least talking about more current Facebook-related topics? (The never-ending stream of LivingSocial quizzes, perhaps? Or the relatively recent ‘25 things about me’ flood? Terms of service controversy, anyone?)”
As I watched these shows, I wondered, “How can someone who doesn’t really get this stuff be the one whose job it is to write about it?”
Then it hit me: This is just like what’s happening in the business world when it comes to building social media strategies and developing social media policies.
Mining in-house expertise
Companies/organizations should be calling upon their social media-savvy employees to take the lead on engaging the company in social media initiatives and teaching others how to use social media tools. Why not engage in-house social media experts in strategy building, as they’ll know the tips, tricks, and shortcuts to make your social media communication more timely, relevant, and effective? Plus, they’re the ones who probably will end up executing the plans, so why not give them that sense of ownership?
Instead, it seems that an old, ineffective business model is being perpetuated here. You know, the one in which people with little or no knowledge of “task X” are sent to workshops to learn how to do it, or perhaps a new position is created to manage “task X” when there’s already someone in the organization who understands its finer points and could easily incorporate it into his or her duties, even if it meant shuffling around a few responsibilities to balance out the workload?
A similar area of concern is the development of policies for employees’ use of social media on the company’s behalf and on their own. (I’ve heard IBM and Intel cited as examples of best practices in social media policy, and there are plenty of other policy examples on the New PR Wiki as well).
My previous employer did not have a social media policy, but the idea, in general, made sense to me. I had my own “social media policy”; I referred to it as “common sense.” Apparently, though, I am the exception and not the rule, which is why more organizations are developing formalized policies.
Working in a vacuum
I recently had a conversation with someone whose organization is developing a social media policy. However, it was being developed by people who don’t use and/or fully understand social media.
Wait. What?
People who don’t understand the ins and outs of social media tools and who call upon younger employees who are social media-savvy to explain things to them and others are creating a policy by which the people who actually use and understand the technology must abide … without their input? How does this make sense?
It doesn’t!
Developing social media policies in a vacuum is illogical. How can a policy be effective if you haven’t consulted the people to whom it actually will apply? I’m not suggesting the consultation be of the “do you think this is fair?” variety; that essentially would be letting the inmates run the asylum, as the old saying goes.
Crafting a comprehensive policy
What I’m suggesting is talking to the organization’s social media users to determine which tools and technologies they are using, and how; concerns they have regarding how they should manage their online presence, as well as that of the organization (if they’re being called upon to do so); and suggestions for potential policy items.
This conversation could produce almost everything that should be included in an organization’s social media policy — perhaps even issues that the C-suite and managers did not even know about or understand before.
Don’t you think the buy-in from existing employees would be much more likely if they felt the policy’s creation was a collaborative process rather than executives quietly making a bunch of rules about something they don’t understand and then enacting a policy that doesn’t address relevant issues or, even worse, creates more confusion than clarity? (Then there’s the “approval from Legal” issue, but I’m not even going to touch that here.)
Bottom line: Organizations are missing the social media boat by not consulting — and subsequently not empowering — their potential social media champions and capitalizing on their knowledge and ideas to ensure relevance, timeliness, and that all-important buy-in.
Lindsay Allen is a recently laid-off higher education public relations professional and former journalist who is using her layoff time to freelance, as well as to learn more about social media in PR and marketing.


